Research Weekly

Research Weekly

     

RESEARCH WEEKLY: Quality of Life and Schizophrenia

profile-with-brain(Oct. 4, 2016) Critics of psychiatry who argue that people with schizophrenia would be better off without antipsychotic medication misrepresent the best available evidence, including research on medication and quality of life

Read more »  
         

RESEARCH WEEKLY: Clozapine By the Numbers

(Aug. 31, 2016) If a "miracle drug" that reliably reduced life-threatening symptoms of heart disease and lowered treatment costs were prescribed to only 4% of the cardiac patients who would benefit from it, the official and public reaction likely would be strong and negative.

Yet this continues to be the status of the antipsychotic medication clozapine, often known by its trade name, Clozaril, more than 25 years after the drug's 1990 introduction in the United States.

A new analysis of international clozapine utilization rates conducted for the Treatment Advocacy Center found use in the United States of the medication tied with Malaysia's at 4% of schizophrenia patients. E. Fuller Torrey, MD, author of a 2015 survey of comparative use of clozapine among the states, analyzed usage rates in 11 nations on four continents to develop the relative rankings.

At the same time, a study of the business case for using clozapine reports that prescribing clozapine to all the treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia served by the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) would save the US government nearly $300 million annually, despite the cost of monitoring for side effects.

clozapine-utilization-ratesInternational Comparison

Clozapine today remains the only antipsychotic medication approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. A recent study reports that as many as one-third of individuals with schizophrenia are treatment-refractory, meaning they experience persistent psychosis despite adequate treatment with other medications.

Because of side effects on the white blood cells that occur in 8 out of every 1,000 clozapine users, individuals taking clozapine undergo weekly blood tests for the first six months of use, then less often, to identify those for whom the clozapine must be stopped. If the blood is not monitored the side effect could ultimately be fatal. The testing requirement is often cited as a reason for the drug's underuse.

In other nations, however, the testing does not erect the same barrier to treatment of psychotic conditions. Australia makes the most widespread use of clozapine, with 35% of schizophrenia patients receiving the drug. In England, nearly six times more schizophrenia patients receive clozapine than in the United States; in South Korea, more than four times as many patients do.

Use across the United States is also uneven. The Treatment Advocacy Center's Clozapine for treating schizophrenia: A comparison of the states found a seven-fold variation. Based on Medicaid and pharmacy data, South Dakota made the most widespread use of the drug, with 15.6% of schizophrenia patients receiving Medicaid taking the drug, compared with Louisiana, Nevada and Oregon, where only 2% of candidates for the medication were taking it. Only six states achieved the 10% penetration rate considered to be a bare minimum.

"Unconscionable" Practice

The care of schizophrenia patients "represents a major public health challenge in human and economic terms," according to a recent editorial in JAMA Psychiatry, which termed longstanding resistance to prescribing the drug "unconscionable." Direct and indirect costs of schizophrenia for 2013 are estimated at $155 billion in the United States - $44,773 per individual with the disease - in a recent study.

Clozapine is also the only drug with FDA approval for reducing suicidal behavior, which kills more than 40,000 people a year in this country. The medication additionally has been reported to reduce mortality risk for people with serious mental illnesses including schizophrenia. Richard Hayes and colleagues in 2014 reported clozapine associated with lower risk of death from all causes and specifically from suicide, compared to other antipsychotic drugs. The authors found no evidence that the lower risk of death resulted from the mandatory clinical monitoring.

Jessica L. Goren and colleagues in June 2016 reported that the VHA would save $22,444 per veteran with treatment-resistant clozapine over the first year of therapy, primarily from reduced hospitalization.

orpa-stacked-logo
Doris A. Fuller

Chief of Research and Public Affairs


References:

Next Week: Clozapine by the Numbers

Research Weekly is a summary published as a public service of the Treatment Advocacy Center and does not necessarily reflect the findings or positions of the organization or its staff. Full access to research summarized may require a fee or paid subscription to the publications.

To comment, visit our Facebook page. 
Visit our blog archive to read all our recent posts.

Read more »  
 

RESEARCH WEEKLY: The Perilous Shortage of Psychiatrists

(Aug. 23, 2016) Serious mental illness (SMI) is associated with a multitude of consequences that can shorten and reduce the quality of life for those who have it. Arrest, incarceration, homelessness, victimization, violence including suicide, and a host of similarly catastrophic impacts fall disproportionately on the barely 3% of the population with schizophrenia and severe bipolar disorder.

help-wantedIn any given year, fewer than half the estimated 8.1 million of people with these psychiatric disorders in the United States receive treatment. Count among the many barriers to their treatment an acute and worsening shortage of psychiatrists, as a new report in Health Affairs details.

The federal government identifies Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs) based on the ratio of physicians to residents in specific geographic areas. Mental health HPSAs are based on the ratio of psychiatrists to residents. There are approximately 4,000 of these HPSAs in the country. The federal Health Resources and Services Administration estimates only half of them have enough psychiatrists to meet demand.

Three Questions of Supply

The title of the paper spells out the result: "Population of US practicing psychiatrists declined, 2003-13, which may help explain poor access to mental health care." In the study, Tara F. Bishop and colleagues take on three questions:

  • Did the supply of psychiatrists change from 2003 to 2013 and, if so, how much compared with other specialties?
  • What regions of the country have the largest and smallest supplies of psychiatrists, per capita?
  • What population characteristics are associated with psychiatrist supply?

The research team found that the average number of psychiatrists per 100,000 residents dropped by 9% during the 10-year period, after adjusting for population growth. By comparison, the average number of neurologists increased by 20% and the average number of primary care physicians - also considered a low-supply specialty - increased by nearly 2%. The population-adjusted number of total physicians in the United States grew by 4%, while the number of psychiatrists dropped 0.2%. The reduction "likely limits patients' access" to psychiatric services," the authors said.

Shortages were not geographically distributed. New England enjoyed the highest concentration of psychiatrists at 24.5 per 100,000 residents, while the Pacific region was served by barely half that many: 13.3 per 100,000 people. Of all physician specialties analyzed, psychiatrists were the most unequally distributed by region. Their distribution was influenced by regional education and income with greater psychiatrist supplies in areas with more high school graduates and higher household income. Areas of low population density also may be at "high risk" of shortages, they said.

Implications of Shortages

"The concern is that if this trend continues, access will worsen over time," the authors conclude. Other mental health professionals - psychologists, psychiatric nurses, social workers and others - are believed to make up 95% of the mental health workforce and also serve psychiatric patients, they said, "However, psychiatrists - because of their medical training and ability to prescribe medications - provide different care than these other providers do."

Among the implications of psychiatrist shortages noted by the authors:

  • The supply of psychiatrists "likely limits" access to services by people with serious mental illness and threatens mental health parity as required by the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008. It is likely to grow worse unless addressed.
  • Policymakers, payers and the community need to develop strategies to recruit and retain psychiatry specialists. Among these is addressing compensation for psychiatrists, among the lowest-paid specialties.
  • Because of how much time it would require for such strategies to begin filling the gap, alternative treatment models need to be explored for providing psychiatric care. These include coordinated care practices, in which psychiatrists serve as consultants to primary care physicians or other mental health professionals, and new technologies such as telemedicine, mobile health and computer-based interventions.

orpa-stacked-logo
Doris A. Fuller

Chief of Research and Public Affairs


References:

Next Week: Clozapine by the Numbers

Research Weekly is a summary published as a public service of the Treatment Advocacy Center and does not necessarily reflect the findings or positions of the organization or its staff. Full access to research summarized may require a fee or paid subscription to the publications.

To comment, visit our Facebook page. 
Visit our blog archive to read all our recent posts.

Read more »  
 
Page 35 of 39