Massachusetts State Report Card

Massachusetts State Report Card

Last Updated: September 17, 2018

Method and Scoring: State involuntary civil commitment laws are evaluated using a 100-point grading scale. The scoring criteria is in accordance with the Treatment Advocacy Center’s values and policy preferences. Up to 50 points are awarded to a state based on the quality of its inpatient commitment law and up to 50 points are awarded based on the state’s assisted outpatient treatment law. Final letter grades are computed using the following scale:

97 or above      A+
93-96               A
90-92               A-
87-89               B+
83-86               B
80-82               B-
77-79               C+
73-76               C
70-72               C-
67-69               D+
63-66               D
62-60               D
59 or below               F

 

PART ONE: Inpatient Commitment Statute (up to 50 points)
Criterion Citation Specifications Points
1. Citizen access to court, emergency evaluation (5 pts) Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch. 123, § 12(e) ​☒Authorizes family/enumerated adults (3 pts)
☒Authorizes any responsible adult (2 pts)
2. Quality of emergency petition process (5 pts) Mass. Gen. Laws Ann.  ch. 123, § 12 ☒Process specified and reasonable (2 pts)
☒Timelines specified and reasonable (2 pts)
☒Responsible entities identified (1 pt)
☐Requires certification by more than one professional (-2 pts)
☐Emergency evaluation criteria inconsistent with inpatient commitment criteria (-5 pts)
3. Emergency hold duration (5 pts) Mass. Gen. Laws Ann.  ch. 123, § 12(a) ​☒At least 48-hour hold allowed (3 pts)
☒At least 72-hour hold allowed (2 pts)
Three-day period
5
4. Citizen access to court, inpatient petition (5 pts) Mass. Gen. Laws Ann.  ch. 123, § 7(a) ☐Authorizes family/enumerated adults (3 pts)
☐Authorizes any responsible adult (2 pts)
Only the superintendent of a facility may petition
5. Quality of criteria for harm or violence to self or others (up to 10 pts) Mass. Gen. Laws Ann.  ch. 123, § 1 ​☒Contains explicit criteria (10 pts)
☐Language is vague/ambiguous (-3 pts)
☐Harm must be imminent (-3 pts)
10 
6. Quality of criteria for grave disability/basic needs (up to 10 pts) Mass. Gen. Laws Ann.  ch. 123, § 1 ☒Contains explicit criteria (10 pts)
☐Language is vague/ambiguous (-3 pts)
☐Endangerment must be imminent (-3 pts)
☐Criteria require family to turn person out of home to receive treatment (-3 pts)
​☒Unreasonably high risk of harm (-3 pts)
(See comment below)
7. Quality of criteria for psychiatric deterioration (up to 10 pts)   ☐Contains explicit criteria (10 pts)
☐Language is vague/ambiguous (-3 pts)
SUBTOTAL                   32 
PART ONE: Extra Credit
1. Specifies in which court a petition for inpatient commitment shall be filed (1 pt) Mass. Gen. Laws Ann.  ch. 123, § 7 District court
Extra Credit                   1
PART ONE TOTAL         33 

 

PART TWO: Outpatient Commitment Statute (up to 50 points)
Criterion Citation   Specifications  Points
1. AOT explicitly authorized (5 pts)   ☐Requires local government to adopt (-3 pts)
2. Citizen access to court for AOT (5 pts)   ☐Authorizes family/enumerated adults (3 pts)
☐Authorizes any responsible adult (2 pts)
☐Authorizes citizen petition to mental health system only (-2 pts)
3. Criteria sufficiently broad to provide actual access (up to 10 pts)   Evaluate applicable provision only:
☐If inpatient/outpatient criteria are the same: 
        ☐Inpatient criteria include psychiatric deterioration standard (10 pts) or
        ☐No psychiatric deterioration standard, adequate grave disability standard (5 pts)
or
☐If outpatient criteria are distinct from inpatient criteria:
        ☐Allows consideration of length of treatment history ≥ 36 months (2 pts)
                 ☐Does not exclude periods of incarceration or hospitalization (-1 pt)
        ☐Does not limit application to those currently dangerous or unstable (4 pts)
        ☐Does not limit application to those refusing service or currently lacking insight (4 pts)
4. Authorizes AOT directly from community (5 pts)    
5. Procedures sufficiently detailed to guide practitioners (up to 5 pts)   ☐Process specified and reasonable (1 pt)
☐Timelines specified and reasonable (1 pt)
☐Responsible entities identified (1 pt)
☐Periodic reporting to court required (1 pt)
☐Renewal process expressly specified (1 pt)
6. Procedures require the treatment plan to be shared with the court (5 pts)    
7. Specifies procedures and consequences for nonadherence (5 pts)    
8. Duration of initial order (5pts)   ☐=90 days (2 pts) or
☐>90 days (5 pts)
9. Duration of continued order (5pts)   ☐=180 days (2 pts) or
☐>180 days (5 pts)
SUBTOTAL                  
PART TWO: Extra Credit
1. Specifies court for AOT (1 pt)      
2. Court monitoring of voluntary settlement agreements (5 pts)      
Extra Credit                   0
PART TWO TOTAL        

 

FINAL SCORE
PART ONE TOTAL      33 
PART TWO TOTAL     
TOTAL      33 
GRADE     

Comment:

  • Requires “very substantial risk of physical impairment or injury.”